2021
Solorio, Thamar; Shafaei, Mahsa; Smailis, Christos; Bushman, Brad J.; Gentile, Douglas A.; Scharrer, Erica; Stockdale, Laura; Kakadiaris, Ioannis
White Paper – Objectionable Online Content: What is harmful, to whom, and why Online
2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Objectionable Online Content
@online{Solorio2021,
title = {White Paper - Objectionable Online Content: What is harmful, to whom, and why},
author = {Thamar Solorio and Mahsa Shafaei and Christos Smailis and Brad J. Bushman and Douglas A. Gentile and Erica Scharrer and Laura Stockdale and Ioannis Kakadiaris},
url = {http://ritual.uh.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/W1-white-paper.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-28},
abstract = {This White Paper summarizes the authors' discussion regarding objectionable content for
the University of Houston (UH) Research Team to outline a strategy for building an
extensive repository of online videos to support research into automated multimodal
approaches to detect objectionable content. The workshop focused on defining what harmful
content is, to whom it is harmful, and why it is harmful.},
keywords = {Objectionable Online Content},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
This White Paper summarizes the authors’ discussion regarding objectionable content for
the University of Houston (UH) Research Team to outline a strategy for building an
extensive repository of online videos to support research into automated multimodal
approaches to detect objectionable content. The workshop focused on defining what harmful
content is, to whom it is harmful, and why it is harmful.
the University of Houston (UH) Research Team to outline a strategy for building an
extensive repository of online videos to support research into automated multimodal
approaches to detect objectionable content. The workshop focused on defining what harmful
content is, to whom it is harmful, and why it is harmful.
Solorio, Thamar; Shafaei, Mahsa; Smailis, Christos; Augenstein, Isabelle; Mitchell, Margaret; Stapf, Ingrid; Kakadiaris, Ioannis
2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Objectionable Online Content
@online{Solorio2021b,
title = {White Paper - Creating a Repository of Objectionable Online Content: Addressing Undesirable Biases and Ethical Considerations},
author = {Thamar Solorio and Mahsa Shafaei and Christos Smailis and Isabelle Augenstein and
Margaret Mitchell and Ingrid Stapf and Ioannis Kakadiaris},
url = {http://ritual.uh.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/W2-Ethics-White-Paper.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-28},
abstract = {This white paper summarizes the authors' structured brainstorming regarding ethical
considerations for creating an extensive repository of online content labeled with tags that
describe potentially questionable content for young viewers. The workshop focused on four
topics: 1) identifying risks for unintended biases in the data and labels, 2) how to reduce risks
for unintended biases; 3) identifying ethical considerations of the annotation task, and 4)
reducing the risks for the annotators.},
keywords = {Objectionable Online Content},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
This white paper summarizes the authors’ structured brainstorming regarding ethical
considerations for creating an extensive repository of online content labeled with tags that
describe potentially questionable content for young viewers. The workshop focused on four
topics: 1) identifying risks for unintended biases in the data and labels, 2) how to reduce risks
for unintended biases; 3) identifying ethical considerations of the annotation task, and 4)
reducing the risks for the annotators.
considerations for creating an extensive repository of online content labeled with tags that
describe potentially questionable content for young viewers. The workshop focused on four
topics: 1) identifying risks for unintended biases in the data and labels, 2) how to reduce risks
for unintended biases; 3) identifying ethical considerations of the annotation task, and 4)
reducing the risks for the annotators.
Kakadiaris, Ioannis; Smailis, Christos; Shafaei, Mahsa; Escalante, Hugo Jair; Ricci, Elisa; Salah, Albert Ali; Struc, Vitomir; Solorio, Thamar
White Paper – Creating a Community of Scholars: Automatic labeling of questionable online content Online
2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Objectionable Online Content
@online{Kakadiaris2021,
title = {White Paper - Creating a Community of Scholars: Automatic labeling of questionable online content},
author = {Ioannis Kakadiaris and Christos Smailis and Mahsa Shafaei and Hugo Jair Escalante and Elisa Ricci and Albert Ali Salah and Vitomir Struc and Thamar Solorio},
url = {http://ritual.uh.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/W3-White-Paper.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-28},
abstract = {This white paper summarizes the authors' structured brainstorming regarding creating an
extensive repository of online content labeled with tags that describe potentially questionable
content for young viewers. The workshop focused on three topics:
1. Creating a community of scholars that will contribute to the problem
2. Establishing broad definitions of what constitutes questionable content and of their
sources
3. Setting a sound and ethical approach to data collection and annotation.},
keywords = {Objectionable Online Content},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
This white paper summarizes the authors’ structured brainstorming regarding creating an
extensive repository of online content labeled with tags that describe potentially questionable
content for young viewers. The workshop focused on three topics:
1. Creating a community of scholars that will contribute to the problem
2. Establishing broad definitions of what constitutes questionable content and of their
sources
3. Setting a sound and ethical approach to data collection and annotation.
extensive repository of online content labeled with tags that describe potentially questionable
content for young viewers. The workshop focused on three topics:
1. Creating a community of scholars that will contribute to the problem
2. Establishing broad definitions of what constitutes questionable content and of their
sources
3. Setting a sound and ethical approach to data collection and annotation.